Sigler v. State

Thomas Sigler (defendant) appeals the summary denial of what the trial court properly deemed to be a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence.1 He challenges his “sexual predator” status. We affirm.

The defendant first contends that his sexual predator designation must be stricken pursuant to State v. Robinson, 873 So.2d 1205 (Fla.2004). In Robinson, the Supreme Court issued a narrow holding that the designation as a sexual predator violates the defendant’s right to due process of law in situations where the defendant is not convicted of an offense involving a sexual act. The Robinson…