Legal Opinion

Chambers v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided August 21, 1995No. 02-94-096-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

A jury found Samuel Wayne Chambers (“appellant”) guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assessed punishment of twenty years’ imprisonment. In his sole point of error, appellant argues the trial court erred by refusing to admit into evidence a statement made by appellant to Officer Eddie Dale Neel of the Fort Worth Police Department. We overrule appellant’s sole point of error because the statement was hearsay and did not fall within any of the recognized hearsay exceptions.

On December 10, 1992, John Seipio (“Scipio”), the victim, was hanging out with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Rabbani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Singletary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Kubin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Walck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Daniel Balderas Reyes, AKA Daniel Reyes-Balderas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API