Walck v. State

OPINION

WRIGHT, Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty before a jury to the charge of murder. The jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at 60 years confinement and a $10,000 fine. We affirm.

In a single point of error, appellant maintains that the trial court erred when it would not allow appellant’s own expert witness, to relate, on direct examination, the content of interviews between that witness and appellant. Appellant called Dr. Mark Douglas Cunningham, a clinical and forensic psychologist, to testify as an expert witness during the punishment phase of the trial. Dr. Cunningham had…