Gaffner v. American Finance Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
— This was an action for money had and received. The defendant Sargent was connected with the defendant American Finance Company. The facts .as found by the trial court (and which are clearly supported by the evidence) are as follows: One Hughes stole an automobile in California and drove it to Seattle. Sometime thereafter he sought to obtain a loan on it from the finance company. It did not know Hughes and did not know anything about the title to the machine. After making such investigation as it could, it concluded that Hughes owned the machine, and made him a loan thereon in the sum of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Ball v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Merchants' Insurance Co. of Providence v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Grand Lodge v. TowneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Walker v. ConantMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AvantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- McDonald v. Northern Benefit Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Hilliard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Associates Discount Corporation v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.