Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Ewart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1923No. 6 Div. 784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The bill of complaint could not be maintained on the theory merely of enforcing a parol trust in land, nor of enforcing a contract for an interest in land by specific performance. As last amended, it undertakes to show a contract of joint adventure for the purchase and sale of land, under which the respondent was to buy in the land, or furnish the money therefor, hold it for the joint benefit of complainant and respondent, and when sold divide the net profits between them.

A contract of joint adventure, like any other contract, must be supported by a Valuable consideration. There must be some…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Richmond Worsted Spinning Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  2. Pate v. BILLY BOYD REALTY AND CONST.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Birmingham Vending Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Albert Pack Corp. v. Fickling Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Colbourn v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API