Anderson v. Northern Mill Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Hooker, J., and verdict'of $500 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in appellant’s saw-mill. The respondent worked for one Bartlett, who had a contract with appellant to remove from the mill, and pile in its yard, all lumber- as fast as the same was sawed. The sawing was done in the second story, the boards sliding down an “apron,” so-called, to the main platform in the lower story as they came from the saw, while the heavy timbers came down through a slide or chute, in another place, to the same platform. The respondent’s particular occupation was to assist in carrying boards from their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Schmitt v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.