Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Northern Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Hooker, J., and verdict'of $500 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in appellant’s saw-mill. The respondent worked for one Bartlett, who had a contract with appellant to remove from the mill, and pile in its yard, all lumber- as fast as the same was sawed. The sawing was done in the second story, the boards sliding down an “apron,” so-called, to the main platform in the lower story as they came from the saw, while the heavy timbers came down through a slide or chute, in another place, to the same platform. The respondent’s particular occupation was to assist in carrying boards from their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Schmitt v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API