Legal Opinion

Dowd v. City of Omaha, Douglas County

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1994No. A-92-542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller-Lerman, Judge.

In this condemnation case, Duane J. Dowd and Frances Dee Dowd, appellants and condemnees, appeal from certain trial rulings and the judgment entered by the district court after trial by jury. For the reasons recited below, we reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

This case involves the partial taking of Lots 7,8,9, and 22 in three tracts to the east of the Little Papillion Creek, in a northwest subdivision of the City of Omaha (City) known as Richland Acres. The condemnation action was commenced by the City to acquire the property for park and recreational use…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brown v. WeareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Sorensen v. Lower Niobrara Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McDonald v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinojos v. LohmannColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Swaby v. NORTHERN HILLS REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTH.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API