Lack Singletree Co. v. Cherry
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Miller
Affirming.
The appellant operates a factory in which it makes singletree clips. George Koemer worked as a moulder for the appellant, and the appellee, W. W. Cherry, was his “shifter” or assistant.
Koerner’s duties required him to carry the molten metal from the place where it was melted, and pour it into moulds; and, it was Cherry’s duty to shift the moulds from one place to another, after they were filled with the molten metal, as the necessities of the work required.
The petition alleges that Koerner was so incompetent and negligent by reason of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dolner v. The MonticelloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870
- Conroy v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Bogenschutz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Pfisterer v. J. H. Peter & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- Nashville, C., & St. L. Ry. Co. v. CleaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938