Bowen & Smoot v. Plumlee
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
This action for attorneys’ fees was initiated by the Attorneys against the Children of the Attorneys’ former client. On appeal, the Children challenge various rulings by the trial judge concerning a 12(b)(6) motion and voluntary dismissal of the action.
FACTS
This case involves a suit by Attorneys for collection of attorneys’ fees. The Attorneys represented the defendants’ mother in several domestic and bankruptcy matters over a period of several years. When it became apparent that she might not pay the Attorneys, this action was brought against her children on the theory that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Moyd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Prime Medical Corp. v. First Medical Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Higgins v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Johnson v. DaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Bowen & Smoot v. PlumleeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Bonaparte v. Bonaparte ex rel. Estate of BonaparteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Burry & Son Homebuilders, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.