Legal Opinion

Bowen & Smoot v. Plumlee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 1990No. 23189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This action for attorneys’ fees was initiated by the Attorneys against the Children of the Attorneys’ former client. On appeal, the Children challenge various rulings by the trial judge concerning a 12(b)(6) motion and voluntary dismissal of the action.

FACTS

This case involves a suit by Attorneys for collection of attorneys’ fees. The Attorneys represented the defendants’ mother in several domestic and bankruptcy matters over a period of several years. When it became apparent that she might not pay the Attorneys, this action was brought against her children on the theory that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. LeveretteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Moyd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Prime Medical Corp. v. First Medical Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Johnson v. DaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Bowen & Smoot v. PlumleeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Bonaparte v. Bonaparte ex rel. Estate of BonaparteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Burry & Son Homebuilders, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API