South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Fund v. City of Myrtle Beach
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, J.:
In this declaratory judgment action, the South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Fund (SCMIRF) appeals a summary judgment order requiring it to indemnify the City of Myrtle Beach (the City) for refunds of monies collected pursuant to a city ordinance that had been declared unconstitutional. We reverse.
FACTS
In February 1996, James Daniels filed a class action lawsuit against the City, challenging Myrtle Beach City Code section 21-7(g) and the City’s implementation of that section. The ordinance stated the following:
Any outstanding charges associated with rental or leased…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sloan Construction Co. v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Hartsville v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Financing FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Builders Mutual Insurance v. Oaktree Homes, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012