Legal Opinion

South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Fund v. City of Myrtle Beach

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 2006No. 4088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, J.:

In this declaratory judgment action, the South Carolina Municipal Insurance and Risk Fund (SCMIRF) appeals a summary judgment order requiring it to indemnify the City of Myrtle Beach (the City) for refunds of monies collected pursuant to a city ordinance that had been declared unconstitutional. We reverse.

FACTS

In February 1996, James Daniels filed a class action lawsuit against the City, challenging Myrtle Beach City Code section 21-7(g) and the City’s implementation of that section. The ordinance stated the following:

Any outstanding charges associated with rental or leased…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. B.L.G. Enterprises, Inc. v. First Financial InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Sloan Construction Co. v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Hartsville v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Financing FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Builders Mutual Insurance v. Oaktree Homes, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API