Legal Opinion

In Re Oliver L. North (Gadd Fee Application)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 7, 1994No. 86-6PublishedCited by 33 opinions

(Division for the Purpose of Appointing Independent Counsels .Ethics in Goyemment Act of 1978, as Amended)

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam 1

This matter coming to be heard and being heard before the Special Division of the Court, upon the application of Richard B. Gadd for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees pursuant to § 593(f) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 591 et seq. (1988), and it appearing to the Court for the reasons more fully set forth in the opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, that the motion is well taken, in part, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED . and DECREED that the United States reimburse Richard B. Gadd for attorneys’ fees he incurred during the investigation by Independent…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited12 opinions

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
In Re Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

Michigan Flyer LLC v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
In Re Oliver L. North (Reagan Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
Mohamad v. RajoubCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
Merrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
In Re Janet G. Mullins (Mullins Fee Application)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.