Legal Opinion
Joice v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 5, 1916No. 30671PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice
The plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States to furnish a large amount of lumber, to be used in the construction of dams at Locks 3 and 5 in the Cumberland Liver. The contract was awarded him after due advertisement for proposals and a dozen or more bidders had submitted proposals. The specifications described the sizes and stated the purposes of the desired lumber.
Within a few days after the contract was made the plaintiff wrote Maj. Harts, defendants’ Engineer officer in charge, *440calling his attention to the first clause of paragraph 22 of the specifications, stating his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Standard Steel Car Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Fitzgibbon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
- Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922
- Dravo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Winchester Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.