Legal Opinion

People v. Whittaker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2001No. Docket 115917PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was found guilty by a jury of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. However, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. It found an abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to admit evidence of defendant’s prior delivery of cocaine and that the error more probably than not affected the jury’s verdict. We conclude that even if the evidence was improperly admitted, the defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating that the error undermined the reliability of the verdict. We therefore reverse, and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. TomaMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. BentonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. Lanzo Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. AlbersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API