Legal Opinion

Boccuti v. Spitznagle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 28, 1934No. [No. 4, January Term, 1934.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

A purchaser of leasehold property sold by administrators at a private sale appeals from an order of the orphans’ court setting the sale aside upon exceptions filed by a competing bidder. The private sale was duly authorized, the price accepted was above the appraised value, and there is no question of the diligence of the administrators in seeking possible purchasers, unless the exceptant may be said to have raised one. His contention is that the administrators had promised him an opportunity to meet any higher offer than one he had already made, but failed to give him that opportunity before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silverberg v. SilverbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. In Re Buckler TrustsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  3. Fulford v. FulfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Blank v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Loft, Inc. v. SeymerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Latimer v. MechlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harlan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API