Legal Opinion

Nathaniel Errol Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1980No. 79-1931PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Nathaniel Errol Smith, an inmate of the federal penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana, appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On November 1,1976, Smith was indicted in the Eastern District of Missouri on charges of forcible entry into a postoffice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115 (1976), and theft of mail matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708 (1976). He entered a plea of guilty to the charge of forcible entry and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. This sentence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Procunier v. AtchleySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Leslie D. Willis v. Dr. P. J. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Corey Earl Engelen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Bruce E. Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Roche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Atkinson v. Prudential Property Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Anthony Wilson Kingsberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API