Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

On the argument, defendants insisted upon their exceptions to the refusal of the court to grant their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. The first exception has been waived by the defendants. Smith v. Pritchard, 173 N. C., 720. They had the right to rely on the weakness of the plaintiff’s evidence when he rested his case; but, having elected to offer testimony in their own behalf, they did so cum onere, and only their exception noted at the close of all the evidence may now be urged or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Murdock v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Burns-Hammond Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Owens v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Lane v. Eastern Carolina Drivers AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API