Legal Opinion

Reed v. Tom

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1928No. 2116PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Defendant in error, Tom, brought this suit against R. D. Pollard, D. Standefer, Allen Reed, J. H. Burnam, B. P. Eidson, and J. N. Woody, upon certain notes alleged to have been executed by Standefer in favor of J. A. Murphy in part payment for a tract of land conveyed by Murphy to Stan-defer on November 22, 1923.

Material allegations' of the petition are to the following effect, viz.: A vendor’s lien to secure the payment of the notes was retained in the deed from Murphy to Standefer; Murphy transferred the notes and lien to Tom; the land had been conveyed by Standefer to Pollard, the latter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rippetoe v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Miller v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ridge of Brooklyn Realty Co. v. OffermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. MastersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Continental Oil Co. of Texas v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Penrod v. Von WolffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Arab Petroleum Corp. v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Grand Court of Order of Calanthe of Texas v. EbelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API