Legal Opinion

Teaster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1999No. 22485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and sentenced as a prior and persistent offender, to ten years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Appellant filed an amended post-conviction motion seeking relief under Rule 29.15, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The hearing court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

In his sole point on appeal, Appellant argues that the hearing court clearly erred in failing to grant an evidentiary hearing. Appellant alleges that since no other testimony was presented by the defense at trial, an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HansonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. MiddaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Sprous v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Teaster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. David Barnett v. Don RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API