Teaster v. State

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

This is a Rule 29.15 case in which the motion court denied the request of Michael Teaster (“Movant”) for post-conviction relief.1 The denial came after the court held an evidentiary hearing. Movant appeals, charging the motion court clearly erred in rejecting two of his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We disagree. We affirm the motion court’s denial of Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief.

*859A jury convicted Movant of felony driving while intoxicated (“DWI”), § 577.010.2 Movant had multiple convictions, so the trial court imposed sentence. See §…