Legal Opinion
Podlesnick v. Airborne Express, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 21, 1982No. C-3-81-453PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTION BY PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; MOTION SUSTAINED; DEFENDANT TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN STATED PERIOD OF TIME; DEFENDANT GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN DATE CERTAIN; BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET ON AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ENTRY OF CONTINUANCE; TRIAL DATE AND OTHER DATES SET
RICE, District Judge.
This case arises out of Defendant discharging Plaintiff from his employment on May 15, 1981. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this Court on August 27, 1981, and Defendant filed an answer thereto on September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Douglas Estes v. Kentucky Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Charles Adams v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wimm v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987
- Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Podlesnick v. Airborne Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Wimm v. Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993