Legal Opinion

Sherman v. City of Tempe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 5, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 00-0348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 From the inception of statehood, Arizona’s public policy has been to have an informed electorate. Indeed, this policy is firmly embodied in our constitution. To further the constitutional policy of adequately informing the state’s voting population, the legislature has enacted statutes that require cities, under certain circumstances, to distribute publicity pamphlets that inform the voters of the nature and details of the issues placed on the ballot. Adhering to this longstanding policy, we hold that a city’s failure to timely distribute publicity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kerby v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. City of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API