Legal Opinion
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 20, 2007No. 05-381PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
Respondent Ross-Simmons, a sawmill, sued petitioner Weyerhaeuser, alleging that Weyerhaeuser drove it out of business by bidding up the price of sawlogs to a level that prevented Ross-Simmons from being profitable. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Ross-Simmons on its monopolization claim, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. We granted certiorari to decide whether the test we applied to claims of predatory pricing in Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U. S. 209 (1993), also applies to claims of predatory bidding. We hold that it does. Accordingly, we vacate the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Jeff Boardman v. Pacific Seafood GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.