Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 27, 1926No. 4512PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) After a careful consideration of the allegations of fact set forth in the petition, we are satisfied that at the time the assault which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s son was made the relation of master and servant existed between the defendant and the déce*952dent. The decedent was, employed as “an oiler” on board of the ship then docked at the terminals of the defendant company. He was a member of the crew of the ship, and his relationship to the defendant company as an employee had not been broken or discontinued. The mere fact that he had…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Covington v. Berkeley Granite Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Berkeley Granite Corp. v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Wicker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Carswell v. Woodward Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.