Legal Opinion
Larson v. Johnson
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 5, 2002No. 1:01-cr-00059PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought suit seeking to force Defendants to pay fees and wages they allegedly owed him for work he performed on a construction project. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 14). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
The Court will grant a motion for summary judgment “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Desmond v. Varrasso (In Re Varrasso)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Ward v. Massachusetts Health Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Hinchey v. Nynex Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ingram v. Rencor Controls, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Roger Edwards, LLC. v. Fiddes & Son, Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Scovil v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Donovan v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- DIALOGO, LLC v. BauzaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.