Legal Opinion

Grappo v. McMills

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2017No. A147522Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/23/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO DONALD T. GRAPPO, Plaintiff and Appellant, A147522 v. HEATHER McMILLS et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG13702180) Defendants and Respondents. Representing himself, appellant Donald T. Grappo filed a complaint purporting to allege 10 causes of action. Seven of the causes of action were set forth in one paragraph, the other three ranging from two paragraphs to five—a complaint, we note, that as framed could not have withstood a demurrer. Grappo had the complaint…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API