Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Town of Clinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover property damages, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered May 28, 1987, which denied their motion for leave to enter a default judgment and granted the defendant Town of Clinton’s cross motion to open its default in answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of its cross motion to vacate its default in answering, the defendant presented an affidavit from its newly elected Town Clerk who received the service of process. Due to her inexperience in such matters, she filed away the papers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Stolpiec v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Vernon v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Saltzman v. Knockout Chemical & Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleary v. East Syracuse-Minoa Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Plymouth Realty Group, Inc. v. Town of CortlandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API