Legal Opinion

Bortz v. Henne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was a suit in trespass for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile collision at the intersection of Haines Street and Stenton Avenue in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $7,000. After the lower Court had denied a motion (a) for a new trial, and (b) for judgment n.o.v., defendant took this appeal. Appellant (defendant) asks (1) judgment n.o.v. because of plaintiff's contributory negligence, or, in the alternative, (2) a new trial on the basis of plaintiff’s allegedly prejudicial reference to an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Trimble v. MerloeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Gregorius v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Guzman v. BloomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Deeney v. KraussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Brandon v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Pushnik v. Winky's Drive in Restaurants, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sullivan v. WolsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Nicholson v. GarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API