Legal Opinion

Detwiler v. City of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff sued and recovered for injuries received from the falling of a bridge claimed to be in Wall street, in the city of Lansing. Numerous errors were originally assigned, but all are now abandoned excepting those which relate to the rulings of the circuit judge hereinafter specifically referred to.

The testimony tended to show that Wall street was extended across a mill-race many years ago, to connect with a narrow street called “Pace Street," on the west bank of the canal; that about the year 1854 a bridge across this canal was constructed, substantially across the center of the street,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Saulsbury v. . Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Shartle v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  3. Barnes v. Incorporated Town of NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Estelle v. Village of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  5. Cobb v. Inhabitants of StandishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Will v. Village of MendonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. City of Chicago v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Severa v. Village of Battle CreekNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API