Legal Opinion

Will v. Village of Mendon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to St. Joseph; Loveridge, J. Case by Mary Will against the village of Mendon for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for an injury suffered through a fall on a defective sidewalk by reason of being tripped by the tipping up of a board on July 4, 1889. The defendant claims that the place where the accident occurred was land owned by a railroad company, which was used as a street, and that the city was not responsible for the injury. There was testimony that the city assumed to control and use this land as a public street. The court charged the jury as follows:

“I instruct you that if you are satisfied from the evidence that the defendant assumed care and control of the walk,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Johnson v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Wallace v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. O'Neil v. Village of West BranchMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McKormick v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Green v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Schock v. CoolingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API