Legal Opinion

Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc. v. Saporito

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 17, 2005No. 329,2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

Bell Atlantic-Delaware Inc., now Verizon-Delaware Inc., appeals a judgment of the Superior Court ordering it to repay an employee, Appellee Domenic A. Saporito, the excess of an amount Saporito paid to satisfy a workers’ compensation hen held by the company. Verizon contends that the trial judge undervalued the hen by characterizing certain payments as personal-injury protection (PIP) benefits instead of workers’ compensation. In this opinion, we conclude that the subrogation rights of employers and self-insurers under Delaware’s no-fault insurance and employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Keeler v. Harford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Waters v. United StatesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Roadway Express v. FolkSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levy v. HLI Operating Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  2. Cooke v. MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Johnson v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API