Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2008No. 27,214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} Sandra Ramirez (Defendant) appeals her convictions for two counts of burglary, one count of criminal trespass, and two counts of shoplifting. She raises four issues on appeal: (1) Defendant was entitled to jury instructions listing either shoplifting or larceny under $250 as a lesser-ineluded offense of felony burglary; (2) under the plain language of NMSA 1978, § 30-16-20(0 (2006), Defendant may not be charged with shoplifting and another offense arising from the same transaction; (3) Defendant’s convictions for both criminal trespass and burglary violate her right…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MeadorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. JojolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SkippingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. FordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
  4. State v. PeraltaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. TenorioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API