Clamorgan v. Lane
Supreme Court of Missouri
ERROR to St. Louis Circuit Court. POINTS. 1st. The limitation in the conveyance of Clamorgan to Brazeau, and Brazeau to the children, did not restrain the children of Clamorgan from making partition before they were twenty-jive years of age. The words of the limitation are, that they should not be able to use the same by selling, pledging, or mortgaging it, before the youngest should attain the age of twenty-five years. 2nd.
Read the full summary
ERROR to St. Louis Circuit Court. POINTS. 1st. The limitation in the conveyance of Clamorgan to Brazeau, and Brazeau to the children, did not restrain the children of Clamorgan from making partition before they were twenty-jive years of age. The words of the limitation are, that they should not be able to use the same by selling, pledging, or mortgaging it, before the youngest should attain the age of twenty-five years. 2nd. The will of Cyprian Martial Clamorgan, was made after he was twenty-one years old, and operated to pass the title to the lands described therein, although made before he…
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.
At the July term 1842, of the St. Louis circuit court, Hardage Lane filed his petition for the partition of a part of block No. 25, in the city of St. Louis. The lot is described in the petition as follows : Beginning at the south-east corner of block 25, at the intersection of Main and Oak streets, and running thence northwardly along the western edge of Main street, forty-three feet to the south-east corner of a lot of Sylvester Pratte ; thence westwardly with the southern line of said Pratte’s lot one hundred and ten feet; thence northwardly along the western boundary of said Pratte’s lot,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- White v. ReaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Huth v. Carondelet Marine Railway & Dock Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Vermillion v. LeClareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Bartlett v. EddyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.