Legal Opinion

State v. Gaffney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 2000No. 2 CA-CR 99-0189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Michael Gaffney’s motion to suppress his blood and urine test results obtained after he was arrested for driving while under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4032(G). Finding that the trial court erred in granting the motion, we vacate its order.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 We view the following facts adduced at the suppression hearing in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. State v. Moore, 183 Ariz. 183, 901 P.2d 1213…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. KorzuchArizona Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aguilera v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  2. State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API