Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 2017No. COA17-55PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

*767 Defendant Robert Lewis Bishop appeals from the trial court's orders requiring him to enroll in satellite-based monitoring. Bishop did not timely appeal these orders. As explained below, because the arguments Bishop seeks to raise in this appeal are either procedurally barred or *768 meritless, in our discretion we decline to issue a writ of certiorari and dismiss this untimely appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Facts and Procedural History

A jury convicted Defendant Robert Lewis Bishop of three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child. The offenses occurred in 2015 and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. HaseldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. CozartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. DeJesusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. GentleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. LoftisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API