Legal Opinion

State v. . Stratford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1908PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.

The prisoner and Sue Watts were indicted for the murder of Thomas Furr. The Solicitor elected not to prosecute for the capital offence. Both prisoners were convicted of murder in the second degree. Stratford only appealed. ITis exceptions are:

Exception 1. Refusal to strike out evidence of threats made by Stratford two weeks before the., homicide. Evidence of threats made much longer before the homicide were held competent in State v. Exum, 138 N. C., 605.

Exception 2. Evidence of statements of prisoner tending to show that he and deceased were in lewd intiiliacy with Sue Watts was competent,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. State v. . AldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API