Legal Opinion

Novak v. Board of Bar Examiners

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 10, 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

In this case we consider whether S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 3.3, as amended, 380 Mass. 942, 943 (1980) (concerning the necessary law school qualifications for taking the Massachusetts bar examination), should bar the plaintiff, who entered and graduated from law school before the rule was amended, from taking the bar examination where the amended rule now renders the plaintiff ineligible although he would have been eligible to take the examination under the previous rule. See S.J.C. Rule 3:01, § 3.3, 370 Mass. 908 (1976) (the previous rule). In September, 1984, after the plaintiff was denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Application of UrieAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. LaBossiere v. Florida Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners in Re HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Matter of AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re ColissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. In the Matter of TocciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Stigum v. SkloffMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Wei Jia v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Osakwe v. Board of Bar ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API