Legal Opinion

Smith v. International Mercantile Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided July 1, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Motion to Strike Out Interrogatories.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The plaintiff has served upon the defendant written interrogatories, to be answered by him and to be used on the trial of the cause. Presumably they were propounded under au*787thority of section 140 of an act of the Legislature of the state of New Jersey entitled “An act to regulate the practice of courts of law” (P. L. 1903, p. 537), which provides, in substance, that either party may submit interrogatories to the other concerning matters material to the issue, that written answers shall be made thereto within 30 days, and that the answers shall be evidence in the cause if…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. National Cash-Register Co. v. LelandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
  3. Hanks Dental Assn. v. International Tooth Crown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Myers v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Despeaux v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gutterman Strauss Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924
  2. Green v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  3. Morris & Co. v. Skandanavia Ins.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1927
  4. Gutterman Strauss Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API