Barrett v. Faltico
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, District Judge.
The claim asserted by plaintiff’s amended complaint is for damages for personal injury. Defendants, a marital community, have moved for summary judgment. The motion presents the question whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on undisputed facts, shown by the record as it now stands. The record consists of the pleadings, the defendants’ affidavits, plaintiff’s counter-affidavit, and plaintiff’s deposition. 1
Summarized briefly, the undisputed record facts are as follows:
During the late summer and early fall of 1950, defendants, as promoters and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
- Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1956