Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Faltico

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided December 16, 1953No. 1053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DRIVER, District Judge.

The claim asserted by plaintiff’s amended complaint is for damages for personal injury. Defendants, a marital community, have moved for summary judgment. The motion presents the question whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on undisputed facts, shown by the record as it now stands. The record consists of the pleadings, the defendants’ affidavits, plaintiff’s counter-affidavit, and plaintiff’s deposition. 1

Summarized briefly, the undisputed record facts are as follows:

During the late summer and early fall of 1950, defendants, as promoters and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Walsh v. West Coast Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API