People v. Parker
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale. (Howell, J.) Eespondent was convicted of forgery. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 57 Mich. 69.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The respondent Parker was convicted in the circuit court for the county of .Hillsdale upon an information charging him, jointly with Van Alstine and Cleveland, with the crime of forging and uttering a deed to 40 acres of land in said county.
Yan Alstine had been previously found guilty, and the affirmance of the verdict in his case by this Court will be found in the case of People v. Van Alstine, reported in 57 Mich. 69.
The particulars of the forgery are set forth in the opinion in Van Alstine’s Case.
A large number of errors are assigned, but we shall only notice such as shall appear to us to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Randolph v. . LoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. StogsdillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. BellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.