Legal Opinion
Cole v. Toledo Refining Company, LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 24, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00769Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION KEITH COLE, CASE NO. 3:23 CV 769 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II TOLEDO REFINING COMPANY, LLC, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ORDER INTRODUCTION Currently pending before the Court in this personal injury suit is Defendant Toledo Refining Company, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Keith Cole’s Complaint. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff opposed (Doc. 5), and Defendant replied (Doc. 6). Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.