Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Torres

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1993No. 01556Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPopovich, Judge

I concur with the Majority’s decision to grant Torres’ counsel’s request to withdraw and affirm the judgment of sentence, especially in light of Torres’ presentment of a pro se amended brief reflective of his concerns on appeal. However, I dissent to that portion of the Majority’s discussion which implies that the laudatory features inherent in a requirement that appointed counsel consult with a defendant, in advance of formulating whether and to what extent an appeal is to be perfected and the substance of the claim(s) to be raised if appellate review is sought, may be dispensed with as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Smith v. Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. RagoliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. McLaurinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API