Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Bowser
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-3597Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) LAMAR R. PEARSON, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 23-cv-3597 (APM) ) PHIL MENDELSON, MURIEL BOWSER, ) & D.C. RETIREMENT BOARD ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Pro se Plaintiff Lamar R. Pearson, Sr. is a former D.C. public school teacher who receives healthcare insurance benefits through the D.C. Retirement Board. Compl., ECF No. 1 [hereinafter Compl.], at 1. In 1991, he enrolled in a plan with Kaiser Permanente. Id. In 2018, he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.