Legal Opinion
Hamsa v. Hamsa
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 17, 1996No. Nos. 95-CA-736, 95-CA-737PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEREMY CHIASSON, Judge, Pro Tempore.
This is an appeal by Dr. Rudolf V. Hamsa from the trial court ruling that his former wife, Cynthia Badinger Hamsa, was without fault in the breakup of their marriage. The fault of Ms. Hamsa was the only issue before the trial court. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
The Hamsas were married on May 20, 1984 and established their matrimonial domicile in Jefferson Parish. A petition for separation was filed by Ms. Hamsa on December 2,1987 and a petition for divorce filed by Dr. Hamsa on November 13, 1989. A judgment of divorce based on living separate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Lagars v. LagarsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Doran v. DoranLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shirley v. ShirleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rusk v. RuskLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Neff v. NeffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015