Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 12, 1994No. 94-C-1090PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

648 So.2d 359 (1994)

Charles Harold ALLEN

v.

Mildred Joe Neal ALLEN.

No. 94-C-1090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 12, 1994.

Rehearing Denied January 26, 1995.

Tommy J. Adkins, Barham, Adkins & Tatum, for applicant.

Bobby L. Culpepper, for respondent.

WATSON, Justice.[1]

The question presented is the type of fault which will bar a needy spouse from permanent alimony. LSA-C.C. art. 112.

FACTS

The Allens were married in Lincoln Parish (Ruston) on December 6, 1986, and made their home in Jackson Parish (Jonesboro). On October 28, 1991, Charles Harold Allen left the matrimonial domicile and was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Dennis; Concurrence · Kimball.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. Vicknair v. VicknairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  5. Adler v. AdlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. King v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Shirley v. ShirleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Ashworth v. AshworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. McMullen v. McMullenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Barnett v. BarnettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API