Williams v. Dickey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentWelch, J.
I have no concern with the question whether plaintiff should have been granted a license or whether he should now retain his license. I am concerned, however, with the rule of law announced in the syllabus, and the rule announced in the body of the opinion.
Assuming, for the sake of argument, that such a Board would have inherent authority, or implied authority, to revoke a license for fraud in its procurement, still, I think it beyond question that the Legislature would have the authority, in creating such a Board, to deprive it of any such implied power. This, our Legislature has done by our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1891
- Johnson v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Calvin Phillips & Co. v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Fisher v. State Insurance BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.