Commonwealth v. French
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
Following a jury-waived trial, a judge of the District Court found the defendant guilty of breaking and entering in the daytime with the intent to commit a felony, and larceny of property over $250. On appeal, the defendant argues that absent additional evidence linking him to the crimes, a latent fingerprint was legally insufficient to support the convictions. Because we conclude that the Commonwealth did, in fact, present further circumstantial evidence, we affirm the defendant’s convictions.
Background. The undisputed facts are as follows. On August 30, 2013, Albano’s Market in the city of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PlattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017