Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. Barr
Illinois Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Ward
I must, with respect, dissent from the majority’s holding that where, in a broad arbitration clause, “it is unclear whether the subject matter of the dispute falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement, the question of substantive arbitrability should initially be decided by the arbitrator.” 124 Ill. 2d at 447-48.
First, the language of our Arbitration Act is to me indisputably clear and does not permit, much less require, interpretation. The Act, which is set out in the majority’s opinion, states that when there is a substantial and bona fide dispute as to whether the question…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brotherhood of Teamsters and Auto Truck Drivers Local 70 v. Interstate Distributor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Life of America Insurance Company, Insurance Investment Company and John W. Woodward v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.