Legal Opinion

Stern v. Carroll

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 2, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The need to bring repeated summary proceedings for nonpayment of rent establishes prima facie a violation of the substantial obligation to pay the rent when due, even though, by reason of payment after the proceedings have been begun, they do not eventuate in final orders in favor of the landlord (Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc 2d 73). The requirement of a 10-day notice to cure under section 52 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations is inapplicable to the violation here involved (974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240 and cases there cited).

The final order should be reversed, with $30…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 974 Realty Corp. v. LedfordAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957
  2. Stern v. HarroldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Madison 52nd Corp. v. OgustCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  2. Ocean Farragut Associates v. SawyerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  3. 25th Realty Associates v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Zalaznick v. ImbemboAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
  5. 940 St. Nicholas Avenue Corp. v. GrantAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API