Legal Opinion

Zalaznick v. Imbembo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 14, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 13 separate dispossess proceedings over a period of 21 months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted. (See 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc 2d 73; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence, 14 Misc 2d 1070; Stern v. Carroll, 28 Misc 2d 507.)

The final order in favor of tenant should be reversed, with $30 costs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 974 Realty Corp. v. LedfordAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1957
  2. Stern v. CarrollAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960
  3. Stern v. HarroldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
  4. Rental Realty Corp. v. LawrenceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Madison 52nd Corp. v. OgustCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  2. National Shoes, Inc. v. Annex Camera & Electronics, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  3. 25th Realty Associates v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Weil v. ChandlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
  5. Adler v. KleinertCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API