Legal Opinion

Bates v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1993No. 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles L. Bates sued Bentley Development, Ted Lewis, and Greenhills Partnership, Ltd. for breach of a settlement agreement. The court granted Bates’s motion for summary judgment. The Bentley group made a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment, which the court denied. The Bentley group appeals. We affirm.

The Bentley group hired Bates to do architectural work. After it failed to pay Bates for his services, Bates sued the Bentley group. The group informed Bates that it had serious financial difficulties, and even if Bates obtained a judgment, the group would probably not be able to pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Hatchell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Bluffton Towne Center, LLC v. Gilleland-PrinceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. First South Bank v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Curry v. Carolina Insurance Group of SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. Kumpf v. United Telephone Co. of the Carolinas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API